UTO Wire

Project and Culture News from UTO

Skip to content

Archive for the 'CRM Talk' Category

ASU & BbSS Parature Activity, an Initial Picture – May through June

Friday, July 8th, 2011

Here’s a first glance into ticketing activity from our new ticketing management system, Parature. Blackboard Student Services (BbSS), our new Help Desk partner, is using Parature for all ticketing, and we have a window into their activity which we never had with our previous provider. From ASU, Financial Aid, Human Resources and the UTO will be adopting this new-to-us ticket management system, but so far only some of their teams have migrated. The UTO has migrated the teams most likely to receive escalated tickets from the Help Desk in our first transition phase; the others will be migrated in the months to come.

The new Help Desk kicked off their service on May 19th along with the Phase 1 UTO teams. That was in the middle of a week, so the first week’s numbers are lower. We all quickly ramped up usage of the new system, as you can see below, and the week of 7/3 isn’t over yet, so those numbers are lower also. We’re still learning our way around this data, so you can expect the picture to become more clear in the future, but this is a good first look. These numbers exclude canceled tickets, tickets created through SPAM, and tickets that were transferred to CRM, so we don’t report on the same issue more than once. (Reporting from our old CRM system will pick up again soon.)

Week Beginning BbSS New ASU New BbSS Solved ASU Solved
5/15/11 948 152 847 86
5/22/11 4114 584 3975 461
5/29/11 6576 926 6458 665
6/5/11 6313 1053 6274 1036
6/12/11 6330 1186 6086 1050
6/19/11 6777 842 6734 980
6/26/11 7365 1000 7399 920
7/3/11 6240 560 6290 808
Total 44663 6303 44063 6006

This chart reflects the table above.

First 8 Weeks of Parature Ticketing Activity

There has been some concern about how long it has taken to resolve tickets since the new Help Desk went “live.” We can see above that they have been handling the bulk of our tickets – 88% of all resolved tickets during this period. Below we can see that most tickets have been resolved very quickly – 48% in the first minute, 75% within 10 minutes. There have been some issues to address, but from an overall perspective we can see that most of our customer requests have been addressed in a timely manner.

Time to Solution - how long it has taken to close tickets in the first 8 weeks (in hours)

There’s a lot more to discover in this data, which we’ll be able to explore as we learn our way around this new system. Check back here for updates!

Thanks for reading, and hope you’re having a great summer!

John Wilson

UTO Survey & SLA Monthly Report – November, 2010

Friday, December 10th, 2010

Here is a summary of the full report. To open the full monthly report for November, 2010, please use this link: UTO Monthly Rpt.

UTO Monthly Summary - November, 2010

UTO Monthly Summary - November, 2010

UTO Survey & SLA Monthly Report – October, 2010

Tuesday, November 9th, 2010

Here is a summary of the full report. To open the full monthly report for October, 2010, please use this link: UTO Monthly Rpt.

UTO Monthly Summary - October, 2010

UTO Monthly Summary - October, 2010

UTO Survey & SLA Monthly Report – September, 2010

Friday, October 1st, 2010

Here is a summary of the full report. To open the full monthly report for September, 2010, please use this link: UTO Monthly Rpt.

UTO Monthly Summary - September, 2010

UTO Survey & SLA Monthly Report – August, 2010

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

Here is a summary of the full report. To open the full monthly report for August, 2010, please use this link: UTO Monthly Rpt.

UTO Monthly Summary - August, 2010

UTO Weekly CRM Reports 8/23 – 8/29/2010

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

Welcome to a new semester, everyone. As we jump in with both feet, the number most on everyone’s mind is how busy are we. Very busy! This week, the first full week of classes, we received 4200 new cases and closed or canceled 3900. That’s up 29% over last year’s first week, which was the previous record-holder.

Fall 2010 Case Volume

Looking at provider group volume, UTOSECISUE jumped to the top of the list, from their typical 50 last week to 10 times that. If you know what’s happening with that group, please reply and let us know. Last week UTOBLKBRD (Blackboard) topped the list dropping somewhat this week, but what isn’t reflected in their numbers are the huge number of course shell requests they handled. (CEM, the Course Enrollment Manager, is not integrated into CRM, and that team is too busy to create cases for all of them.) The Blackboard team, specifically the CEM administrators, closed over 7000 course requests so far for this semester, the vast majority in the last few weeks. Huge kudos to them!

Top 6 Provider Groups - New Cases

We’re doing much better recently closing our cases on time; our “closed over SLA” numbers are lower than I’ve ever seen them – more than a year now – and the trend looks good, even during the busiest time of our year.

Closed Over SLA

Issue cases still open but already over SLA are also doing significantly better, down from over 70% of open cases to just over 50%. That’s still higher than we would like, but definitely a good trend. Request cases over SLA have remained relatively steady, so it might be good to look at those also.

The most problematic statistic is how many cases we have open at the end of the week. That number jumped from one more-or-less stable level around 800-1000 last Fall, to another stable plateau about 1500 for the first part of Spring. However since mid-April we’ve seen a steady increase in this number from about 1400 to 2400 this week. This week’s jump is most likely due to the semester start-up, and the huge jump in UTOSECISUE cases this week, but no single explanation can account for over 4 months of steady increase. The worry, of course, is that this end-of-week backlog increase will put increased stress on the UTO as we try to keep up. So far we are keeping up as our better SLA numbers show.

Open Cases at the End of the Week

Looking at our backlog aging, we can see that almost every age category has increased steadily since April.

Backlog Aging

The top 10 provider groups are typical, though UTOSECISUE has jumped to the top of the list. To compare this chart with April and July, see the UTO CRM Reports 5/3 – 7/18/2010 post.

Backlog Aging - Top 10 PGs

So keep up the good work, everyone. Till next week.

John Wilson

UTO CRM Weekly Activity, 8/23/2010 - 8/29/2010

UTO Survey & SLA Monthly Report – July, 2010

Monday, August 2nd, 2010

Here is a summary of the full report. To open the full monthly report for July, 2010, please use this link: UTO Monthly Rpt.

UTO Monthly Summary - July, 2010

UTO CRM Reports 5/3 – 7/18/2010

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

We’re about half-way through July, which seems like a good time to update everyone on our summer efforts. Our case volume has mostly been hovering between 2000 and 2500 cases per week, which is similar to or just slightly lower than the end of spring semester.

Case Volume - Summer 2010

We have some new Provider Groups in the top 6, though the top 3 are the “usual suspects.” The Blackboard group has been trading off with the HR Help Desk for the top position, but interestingly, one-third to half of the BB group’s new cases end up being canceled, so their “closable” case load is lower than it looks below. The UTO Help Desk (the main 5-6500 line) has been driving more cases than usual to CRM. (They account for the bulk of our help requests, but most of them are handled before they get to CRM.) Fulton Center support (UTO-ATC-FC) has jumped in the last few weeks quite a bit to show up in this group. USITEC has been busy for most of the summer and NCVoice has been growing steadily.

New Cases - Top 6 Provider Groups

Looking at closed case Categories, we again see the “usual suspects.” We might expect Learning Spaces (Blackboard) show up here also – it usually is and Blackboard summer volume has been high. Notice that the largest “category” is “blank.” The top 3 Provider Groups in the “blank” group are Blackboard, Fulton Center, and UTO Help Desk (UTOBLKBRD, UTO-ATS-FC, UTOHD). The Blackboard PG always has the most uncategorized (blank) cases (103 cases in the week ending 7/18), so Learning Spaces really belongs in the top case categories also.

Top 5 Case Categories (plus "blank")

The number of cases closed over SLA has been higher so far during the summer than it was last spring. During the spring semester Issue cases closed over SLA usually hovered between 4% and 6%; summer Issue cases are usually between 6% and 8% over SLA. Request cases are always more erratic, but during the summer they have been running higher than the end of spring.

Cases Closed Over SLA

More problematic are the cases open but already past their SLA, especially Issue cases. Last spring saw a steady increase for Issues from about 40% to over 60%. During the summer this climb is continuing to our current level around 70%.

Open Cases Already Over SLA

This brings up our backlog (number of cases open at the end of the week) and open case aging, topics we’ve explored in past posts. Here’s a longer view history of our backlog:

Backlog - Cases Open at the End of the Week

At least since the week ending April 11th our backlog has been steadily increasing, by more than a third (38%) as of the end of last week (4/11 to 7/18). Our backlog is now equivalent to a whole week of new cases.

To dig into those numbers, we can compare backlog case aging between 4/11 and 7/18, first for all cases, and then focusing on Issue cases.

Backlog Comparison - All Cases - 4/11/2010 vs 7/18/2010

Backlog Comparison - Issue Cases - 4/11/2010 vs 7/18/2010

In both of these comparisons, almost all periods show increases, but the largest jumps are for cases15-30 days old and 2-3 months old. At those ages (and older), most of those cases will already be over SLA.

Looking at Provider Groups with the most open cases at the end of the week, all of them show significant increases in numbers and age between 4/11 and 7/18. (UTO-ATS-FC is an exception, their EOW cases increased, but those cases remain under a week old, so most likely within SLA.)

Backlog Aging - All Cases - 4/11/2010 vs 7/18/2010

Backlog Aging - Issue Cases - 4/11/2010 vs 7/18/2010

These charts look at only the top 10 PGs, but backlog for the majority of our PGs increased steadily over this period, as you can see below.

PGs Avg Backlog
Change
All Cases
Increased 53 +12.5
Decreased 36 -3.6
Issue Cases
Increased 46 +10
Decreased 34 -2.4


During this period our 352 submitted surveys were only 1.6% of closed cases. Unfortunately, our survey system has been broken for a while, so some unknown number of surveys fail (randomly?). Of those that made it, 7.1% had one or more questions answered “unsatisfied” or “very unsatisfied,” so conversely, 92.9% of the surveys had only positive scores.

Good luck over the next (almost) 4 weeks as we prepare for fall semester!

John Wilson

UTO CRM Activity 4/11/2010 - 7/18/2010

UTO Survey & SLA Monthly Report – June, 2010

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010

Here is a summary of the full report. To open the full monthly report for June, 2010, please use this link: UTO Monthly Rpt.

UTO Monthly Summary - June, 2010

UTO CRM Reports Spring Semester 2010

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

Spring semester 2010 was about as busy as last Fall. Again we closed over 40,000 cases, about 2400 per week for the whole period, which includes a quieter week before and after the semester’s classes and the week of Spring Break, significantly quieter. We closed about 67% of those cases within the first 24 hours, which is good, but down slightly from last Fall’s 70%. Cases closed over SLA, Issues and Requests combined, were unfortunately up slightly from last semester to 6.0% of cases with SLAs (no Question cases).

UTO CRM Activitiy - Fall Semester 2009

UTO CRM Activitiy - Fall Semester 2009

Now that we’ve been graphing our new and closed cases for two semesters, the patterns are becoming more clear. The first week is always the peak after which volume slowly fades, with a possible slight rise at the end of the semester. Any weeks with holidays or breaks show large dips in activity. Closed cases show the same pattern, though the peak for closed cases is usually week 2 as we play catch-up with the first week influx.

Spring 2010 New Cases graph

Spring 2010 New Cases

Spring 2010 Closed Cases

Spring 2010 Closed Cases

With two semesters of data, we can look at an average pattern. After removing weeks with holidays and Spring Break, the last two semesters were averaged based on the semester week – week 1 is the week classes start, classes end on week 16 and finals are over on week 17. (Week “-1″ is the week before classes begin.) The trend line is derived from and laid over that average. Given this pattern and knowing when our holidays fall, we can make some predictions for the future, if needed.

Average semester new case volume trend line.

Average semester new case volume trend line.

Typically, most of our cases are Issues, almost 80% of all closed cases, which is up slightly from last Fall; Request cases are about the same as last Fall, 18%, and Questions are slightly down at almost 3%. Of the Issues most are “Standard” priority cases and 0.3% – 91cases – were classified as “Critical’ Issues, the same proportion as last Fall.

Spring 2010 Case Types and Issue Priorities

Spring 2010 Case Types and Issue Priorities

We had a slightly better return on surveys – 2.7% of closed cases received a survey response compared to 2.1% last Fall. Of those, 98 surveys, 8.7%, were scored “unsatisfied” on one or more questions. Last Fall unsatisfied responses were only at 7.6%, so we need to keep track of what’s frustrating our customers. As you can see below, more people were upset about not being kept in the loop while their case was being worked than any other category. We need to address all their concerns, but we should keep customers updated regularly, especially for cases that take a while.

Spring 2010 Surveys with Unsatisfied Scores

Spring 2010 Surveys with Unsatisfied Scores

As I did for last semester, here’s a histogram of how long it took to close our cases this Spring. It’s essentially the same as last semester, slightly less in the first 6 minutes (which probably means more accurate records rather than actually slower response times), but otherwise the same pattern. There’s a dip during the first evening/night after a case was created, and peaks at 1 day, 2 days, and 7 days. (This is a logarithmic scale – over 1 hour each time period is 1.25 times greater than the previous one.)

Spring 2010 - Hours to Close UTO Cases

Spring 2010 - Hours to Close UTO Cases

Adding each segment to the last gives us an interesting cumulative chart which shows the total percentage of our cases closed at each time segment: 70% in the first day (actually 1.2 days), 77% at 2 days, 91% at 1 week, and 98% at 1 month (actually 34 days).

Spring 2010 - Cumulative Closed Cases by Time

Spring 2010 - Cumulative Closed Cases by Time

This analysis is interesting for all cases, but even more interesting when focused on certain case categories and sources. Most dramatic is the set of charts for the Human Resources case category, the great majority of which are resolved by the HR Help Desk provider group. The first chart shows how long it takes to close HR category cases. Notice that almost half the cases are closed by the HRHD provider group in the first 6 minutes.

Spring 2010 - Hours to Close HR Category Cases

Spring 2010 - Hours to Close HR Category Cases

When translated into a cumulative chart, you can see that almost 80% of these cases are closed in the first half hour; 90% at 4.8 hours and about 97% at the end of the first day. Very speedy!

Spring 2010 - Cumulative Closed Cases by Time - HR Category

Spring 2010 - Cumulative Closed Cases by Time - HR Category

At the opposite extreme, cases classified into the Voice/Data/TV category take longer, as should be expected. At the end of the first day only 42% of these cases have been resolved, and even at 1 month only about 92% have been closed.

Spring 2010 - Cumulative Closed Cases by Time - V/D/TV Category

Spring 2010 - Cumulative Closed Cases by Time - V/D/TV Category

We can also use this tool to look at how long it takes cases to close compared with how the case arrived – by a phone call or through email. Not surprisingly, phone sourced cases are closed much quicker – 28% in the first 6 minutes, and 78% at the end of the first day.

Spring 2010 - Cumulative Closed Cases by Time - Phone Source

Spring 2010 - Cumulative Closed Cases by Time - Phone Source

Email sourced cases, however, take significantly longer to resolve. For one thing, essentially none of the cases are resolved in the first 6 minutes, under 20% in the first hour, and only 61% at the end of day 1. By the end of the first week, these cases have almost caught up to phone sourced cases: 91% resolved for email cases vs 93% for phone cases. At the end of the first month they are neck and neck at 98.7% vs 98.6%.

Spring 2010 - Cumulative Closed Cases by Time - Email Source

Spring 2010 - Cumulative Closed Cases by Time - Email Source

CRM analysis blog entries will be arriving more sporadically during the summer, but please comment on this Spring semester overview. Have a great summer!

John Wilson